Archive

Author Archive
Comments off

Einsteinium – Disposable Ear Speculum – Disposable Wound Dressing Pack

Your mindset is a very important component of achieving success in what ever you are trying to achieve. If you have internalized just how very important a healthy mindset is to you, it will help your business dramatically. It is very important to maintain and nurture this critical, extremely powerful and essential part of your success. Here are a list of 7 critical tips of keeping your mind in peak performance.

When you go to the puppy tracks to wager on the sport, you really should get a program promptly upon arriving. The plan will break down each race of the day for you. You will be capable to see the names of the canines and what form of race they will be running.

I’m seeing great interest in my work here in Seattle, and firmly believe that there are people here to wear and enjoy my clothes.and the work of many other designers.

Online Essay Writing Service Review

Buddy up. The fact is, many adults are overweight and, chances are, you have friends or coworkers who may be interested in changing their eating behavior as well. Research shows that when one person slims down, those around him or her are more likely to lose, according to a 2007 study by researchers at Harvard Medical School and custom essay paper reviews essayshark.com/ reviews University of California, Berkeley the University of California, San Diego.

Before entering Hollywood he put in lot of effort in the theaters. He performed in the play “The House of Blue Leaves” after dropping from UCLA. It was during this period he came up with a spoof of “The Color of Money” starring his The House of Blue Leaves co-star John Mahoney and himself. It caught the interest of Lorne Michaels, who purchased and aired it on “Saturday Night Live” a late night American sketch comedy and variety show.

Not however, the Sports activities Betting Champ has cracked the code on MLB and NBA betting. However, the system does arrive with an 60% win price for NFL picks. I know this is absolutely nothing like a 97% results rate, but you can however make income on 60%.

A study by Cornell University professor Brian Wansink showed that the shape of a glass affects how much people perceive to be in it. Even after practicing the appropriate amount, test subjects who were asked to pour 1.5 oz. of liquid into a short, wide glass added between 10% and 30% more than they did when given a tall, thin glass.

Because adequate water is probably one of the missing links in your weight loss plan. Water is essential for weight loss, yet, only one person in five drinks at least eight glasses of water that are eight or more ounces each day. And water can work miracles on the flab you’re trying to say good-bye to. You probably don’t know the essential role of water in your diet.

Take aspirin. Even if you smoke, a recent study at the University of Washington shows that taking four regular-strength aspirins weekly can reduce your risk of lung cancer by 41%. Aspirin works by slowing blood flow to abnormal cells, starving them of the nutrients that they need to survive. However, before beginning any aspirin therapy, be sure and check with your doctor as there are side effects to the regular ingestion of aspirin.

It was a real hoot to hear Click and Clack citing Gottman’s work. They said according to Gottman’s studies of married couples what makes marriages work is when the woman says what she wants and the man does it. Of course, Click and Clack thought that getting men to do what their wives want would be the challenge of succeeding at Gottman’s assertion.

It worked. They absolutely hated the smell. My older dog figured it out quickly and stopped barking in a couple hours. My other dog took a little longer, but she soon stopped barking, too. The only problem I encountered in using the collar was forgetting to turn it off at night, so I had to replace the battery quickly. Other than that, it worked like a charm.

Categories: LoL News Tags:
Comments off

The federal legal justice procedure can not operate without the participation of victims and witnesses. Entire cooperation and truthful testimony of all witnesses and victims are essential to the dedication of the guilt or innocence of a man or woman accused of committing a crime.

Crime victims and witnesses may well expertise thoughts of confusion, disappointment, dread, and anger. If you are a sufferer or a witness, the Victim-Witness Plan of the United States Attorney’s Workplace can support you have an understanding of the legal rights offered to you by law. The United States Attorney’s Place of work is fully commited to guaranteeing that criminal offense victims and witnesses are treated quite by the legal justice process.

This pamphlet will supply responses to several of your queries and will aid you comprehend your legal rights and responsibilities. GENERAL Information and facts FOR VICTIMS AND WITNESSES Participants in the Felony Justice Program Federal Decide: The particular person who a stable prime macbook cases copy beyond Goyard Macbook pro 13 case Macbook Air 13 Case Macbook Pro 15 Case Macbook 12 Case Macbook Air 11 Case Pink Goyard Macbook 12 Case 22 each of these cases will continue nearly any MacBook shielded presides about a court proceeding. Occasionally a Federal Magistrate Judge presides in excess of the continuing.

  • 5 stylish ideas for your macbook cases
  • Phone cases – lessons learned from google
  • The philosophy of phone cases
  • If phone cases is so terrible, why don’t statistics show it?
  • 10 small changes that will have a huge impact on your macbook cases

What is phone cases and how does it work?

He/she has some, but not all, of the powers of a judge. The United States Attorney (U. S. A.


5 romantic phone cases ideas

): The chief prosecutor for violations of federal legislation of the United States. The Usa is appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the United States Senate. The United States Attorney’s offices are element of the United States Department of Justice.

5 actionable tips on macbook cases and twitter.

Assistant United States Attorneys (A. U.

S. A. ): Govt attorneys in the United States Attorneys’ workplaces who prosecute conditions on behalf of the United States.

Victim-Witness Coordinator / Advocate: The man or woman(s) in the United States Attorneys’ places of work who will assist you in your journey by way of the prison justice program process. Witness: A man or woman who has information or proof relating to a criminal offense and delivers facts regarding his/her know-how to a legislation enforcement company. Victim: An unique who has suffered direct actual physical, emotional, or financial harm as a result of the fee of a criminal offense. Defendant: The man or woman accused of committing a criminal offense. The Sufferer-Witness Program Each United States Attorney’s office has a Sufferer-Witness plan which is staffed by at minimum one Sufferer-Witness Coordinator or Victim Advocate. The objective of the Federal Target-Witness Software is to be certain that victims and witnesses of federal crimes are addressed pretty, that their privateness is respected, and that they are taken care of with dignity and respect.

Target-Witness Coordinators and Target Advocates do the job to make confident victims are held educated of the position of a circumstance and aid victims locate expert services to support them in recovering from the crime. Victims’ Lawful Legal rights Below is a record of rights presented to victims by the Crime Handle Act of 1990. This piece of laws presented criminal offense victims with a “Invoice of Legal rights.

” Section of Justice staff members are demanded to use their very best attempts to assure victims acquire these rights. Victims’ rights legal guidelines utilize to victims no matter if or not the target testifies as a witness. The appropriate to be reasonably guarded from the accused.

Categories: LoL News Tags:

Welcome to Tribunal Cases of the Weak. Every week you’ll get the best/weirdest/worst Tribunal cases. As always, purple text is the accused, green text is the team-mates, and red is the opponents. The title of each case is a link to the full Tribunal case, but don’t click through unless you’re ready for NSFW language. Unsure of what the Tribunal is or how it works? Read Riot’s FAQ.

 

There was a potentially overlooked change in the last patch, Patch 3.06:

Boots_of_SpeedBoots

  • Limited to 1 Boots item at a time

This change may have ruined the dreams of trolls.  No longer can six boots of mobility Master Yi terrorize players everywhere.  This marks the end of an era, and to say goodbye we look back on some of multi-booted that have graced the hallowed pages of TCotW.

 

Case #5: “Nid”ing a Ban submitted by Geonice from Volume 20

This Nidalee is guilty of basically ever violation possible.  According to Geonice, her inappropriate name was “HomoBut”.  Then there’s the intentional feeding:

nid2

There’s also the verbal abuse:

nid4

She got seven reports out of a possible nine.  This Nidalee was a real beast.

PunishWarning

 

 

Case #4: Putting the “Intent” in Intentionally submitted by LuBuFu from Volume 13

This case has been submitted by an observant NA Tribunal judge.  In his words: “So, what makes this case interesting? Well let’s start with [an] average of 5 reports a game… That’s a lot…”  Reports like:

lufubu1

LuBuFu goes on to ask, “So, what could have caused this?”

lufubu2

Multiple mobility boots huh?  That last Pantheon must have been running on all fours.

PunishWarning

 

 

Case #3: A Game of Cat and Mouse from Volume 13

The Lux in this game had a bad score and what appears to be a troll “build”.

lux2

And what is the explanation for four pairs of boots, 20 deaths and no CS?

lux1

Well, that makes sense.  Maybe the four pairs of boots were for the cat.

PunishTime Ban

 

 

Case #2: The Feeder submitted by Vokuhilla fromVolume 18

Vokuhilla passed this case along because of the direct and obvious feeding.  What kind of feeding?

feeding1

While sprinkling in fun comments like:

feeding2

Not much to discuss here:

PunishTime Ban

 

 

Case #1: The Cobbler submitted by AmudielWW from Volume 15

Another submission by AmudielWW, who sent in one last week as well.  In this case, Dr. Mundo has developed a shoe fetish.

mundo1

Intentionally feeding and spending all the money on shoes, he really is the Madman of Zaun.  There isn’t much of an explanation in the chat, other than:

mundo2

Mundo goes where he pleases, but apparently this Mundo needs six boots to get there.

PunishTime Ban

 

 

RIP Mundo’s Shose Shop.

 

That’s all for this week! We’ll be back next week with another round of Tribunal Cases of the Weak.

Have a case you think should be included? Send your submissions to [email protected]. Be sure to include the case number and region, your summoner name, and explain what makes it interesting.

Welcome to Tribunal Cases of the Weak. Every week you’ll get the best/weirdest/worst Tribunal cases. As always, purple text is the accused, green text is the team-mates, and red is the opponents. The title of each case is a link to the full Tribunal case, but don’t click through unless you’re ready for NSFW language. Unsure of what the Tribunal is or how it works? Read Riot’s FAQ.

 

Case #5: The Master of Feeding

This player really has figured out how to feed.  His motivations are unclear, but the results can’t be questioned:

yi1

42 deaths, now that’s some serious feeding.  He did ask one question:

yi2

The Tribunal sure loves punishing players like him:

PunishWarning

 

 

Case #4: Unhappy Ending

Unlike the case before, this player didn’t give you a lot of notice that something terrible was coming.  Right at the end of the game, this player likes to add:

sej1

That was game two.  Here is game three:

sej2

And here is game four:

sej3

And here is the punishment:

PunishTime Ban

 

 

Case #3: Spamalot submitted by HDDragon

HDDragon, for reals this time (sorry Geonice!), passed along this case, saying: “Oh…my…goodness… I have never seen such spamming!!”  Frankly, it’s hard to do this case justice.

spam1

Imagine someone doing that, over and over, for 30 minutes.  The mute feature was made for people like him…  But he did sprinkle in a little:

spam2

The Tribunal got the last laugh here. Tribunal es # 1.

PunishWarning

 

 

Case #2: Worst Troll of the Week

You may have read about Restricted Chat mode in a NoL article recently.  The basic idea is to limit the number of times a player can speak in chat as a way to instruct them on being more polite.  This is rehabilitation, as opposed to the banning system previously in place. For example, you take a player who says things like this:

chat1

And instead of giving them a Time Ban, you give them limited chat.  Now there have been cases of this working on the official forums, but in this case…

chat2

Yeah…  This player doesn’t look like he’s reforming any time soon.

PunishTime Ban

 

 

Case #1: Permaban of the Week

Our permaban of the week shows just how ineffective bans can be. This is certainly not this player’s first account. On this smurf, he feeds like crazy:

10minutemail1

And his motivation isn’t exactly pure:

10minutemail2

And he’s definitely not afraid of the other players or the Tribunal. He even tries to recruit his fellow smurfs into trolling too.

10minutemail3

You can see the dilemma Riot is in. Permaban these trolls and they just create new accounts and terrorize new players. Restrict their chat and some will just troll anyway. Hopefully with enough data they can figure out which one to give to whom. So remember to report the trolls you see, and if you have some time, judge some players in the Tribunal. The next game they ruin could be yours.

Punishpermaban

 

 

That’s all for this week! We’ll be back next week with another round of Tribunal Cases of the Weak.

Have a case you think should be included? Send your submissions to [email protected]. Be sure to include the case number and region, your summoner name, and explain what makes it interesting.

Welcome to Tribunal Cases of the Weak. Every week you’ll get the best/weirdest/worst Tribunal cases. As always, purple text is the accused, green text is the team-mates, and red is the opponents. The title of each case is a link to the full Tribunal case, but don’t click through unless you’re ready for NSFW language. Unsure of what the Tribunal is or how it works? Read Riot’s FAQ.

 

Case #5: Darkly Dreaming Darius submitted by Moobu

Moobu sent along a case of a very demented Darius.  There are five filthy games within, but the fourth game is particularly awful.  The accused is on a smurf and isn’t very happy about having to duo-top with Garen.

cards1

How would he get Garen’s credit card numbers you might ask?

cards2

He works for Riot, that could give him access.  Or does he:

cards3

Works for Riot and is undetectable by the police.  Watch out community, cause he’s still out there:

PunishWarning

 

Case #4: The Terror of Twisted Treeline submitted by Elephox

Elephox summed up this case nicely: “This guy seemed to be a riot. Not only did he accuse the enemy team of being hackers, he called the enemies “cowards” and “gipsys” and repeatedly offered “10k Euros” for a variety of objects, from Jax to Fiddle to “family tags.” I think there was something mentally wrong with this player. I now understand why most people avoid the Twisted Treeline.”

gypsy1

That’s six minutes into a game when he starts losing lane to Jax.  But it gets personal:

gypsy2

10k euros, that’s some serious money.  But what does he mean?

gypsy3

Instead of that hackers home address, all it seems like he got was:

PunishTime Ban

 

Case #3: Obvious Troll is Obvious

How obvious?  Here are the scores:

fed1

Blatant feeding.  How ’bout the chat:

fed3

He’s just begging for it:

PunishTime Ban

 

 

Case #2: Worst Troll of the Week

Game 1 of this case features seven reports.  Most games, no matter how foul, tend to have one or two reports.  To get seven, you have to really be making people mad.  Perhaps by feeding:

caitlyn1

Check.  And then some verbal abuse:

caitlyn2

Check.  Followed by some sexual taunting:

caitlyn3

Check again.  And Xin gets to the core of the matter.  Caitlyn just doesn’t care, which makes her a crappy teammate when things start going badly.  She’s on her way to a permaban at this rate.

PunishTime Ban

 

Case #1: Permaban of the Week submitted by Geonice*

Another great submission by Geonice*.  You hear a wide-variety of excuses when people start playing badly.  Mostly players seem to blame other players, like the jungle or the support.  This player suspects his opponents are the cause of his problems:

hacker2

A little paranoia with your flaming.  Now we’re getting somewhere.

hacker3

Some narcissism with your paranoia?  But wait, there’s more:

hacker1

Now we’re there, a narcissistic paranoid racist.  The top 3% of ranked is going to have to go on without him.

Punishpermaban

 

*Earlier versions of this article mistakenly did not credit Geonice for this submission.

 

That’s all for this week! We’ll be back next week with another round of Tribunal Cases of the Weak.

Have a case you think should be included? Send your submissions to [email protected]. Be sure to include the case number and region, your summoner name, and explain what makes it interesting.

Welcome to Tribunal Cases of the Weak. Every week you’ll get the best/weirdest/worst Tribunal cases. As always, purple text is the accused, green text is the team-mates, and red is the opponents. The title of each case is a link to the full Tribunal case, but don’t click through unless you’re ready for NSFW language. Unsure of what the Tribunal is or how it works? Read Riot’s FAQ.

 

Case #5: Chemical Imbalance submitted by That One Six

The latest submission from That One Six brings us the story of an unhinged Singed.  “This Singed started raging at 3 minutes in because someone went Karthus top, and once the ball started rolling, there was no stop.  He made racist comments, used every swear in the book, and couldn’t find the caps lock key.”

singed1

There some of the fun early raging.  Here is the racism:

singed2

And here is when he really loses the caps-lock key:

singed3

This is one Mad Chemist.

PunishWarning

 

 

Case #4: Not So Radiant Dawn submitted by HDDragon

HDDragon sent this along with a short note: “Someone left their caps on!!!!”.  Four exclamation points seemed promising, but how much all-caps shouting can there be?  Well, in this case, three whole games of it.  Like this:

caps1

And here is some in all-chat:

caps2

Three whole games of non-stop shouting.  Needless to say, no one appreciated all the flaming.

PunishWarning

 

Case #3: “Nid”ing a Ban submitted by Geonice

This Nidalee is guilty of basically ever violation possible.  According to Geonice, her inappropriate name was “HomoBut”.  Then there’s the intentional feeding:

nid2

There’s also the verbal abuse:

nid4

She got seven reports out of a possible nine.  This Nidalee was a real beast.

PunishWarning

 

 

Case #2: Worst Troll of the Week

This player defines spamming.  In the second game, he is unhappy with how the game is going and keys in on a phrase:

spam1

Irony, thy name is LoL spammer.  In game 1, this player got ahead early and decided to rub it in:

spam2

The above are just samples, he does this for 20 solid minutes in both games.  But don’t worry, he ends each game with:

spam3

The Tribunal isn’t sorry either.

PunishTime Ban

 

Case #1: Permaban of the Week submitted by lxlslay3rlxl

This permaban is a nice example of people eventually getting what they deserve.  Permabans are only given after a number of warnings and time bans have been applied.  Even then, Riot reviews each permaban.  While you will often see Warnings and simple Time Bans shown in the column, trolls eventually get the permaban they justly deserve.  Does this behavior seem familiar?

deserved1

The obvious feeding and troll builds.  What about some 1v1 me noob?

deserved2

And some racism and strangely sexual chat?  Or perhaps trolling Soraka top in a ranked game?

deserved3

It adds up, eventually.  Players earn their Permabans through repeatedly behaving badly and refusing to change.  Hope it was worth it.

Punishpermaban

 

That’s all for this week! We’ll be back next week with another round of Tribunal Cases of the Weak.

Have a case you think should be included? Send your submissions to [email protected]. Be sure to include the case number and region, your summoner name, and explain what makes it interesting.

Welcome to Tribunal Cases of the Weak. Every week you’ll get the best/weirdest/worst Tribunal cases. As always, purple text is the accused, green text is the team-mates, and red is the opponents. The title of each case is a link to the full Tribunal case, but don’t click through unless you’re ready for NSFW language. Unsure of what the Tribunal is or how it works? Read Riot’s FAQ.

 

Case #5: The Boobie Prize submitted by mhykah

This tribunal case was submitted not just because of intentional feeding but because “in Case #2 the reported seems to have found an alternative to surrendering by re-purposing wards”.  Here’s the feeding:

rivenfeed1

And here is the unusual use for wards:

rivenfeed2

And here is the Tribunal’s judgement:

PunishTime Ban

 

Case #4: The Enigma

Here is some straightforward feeding, the score speaks for itself:

why2

And here is this player’s retort when he’s threatened with reports:

why3

And he’s right, the Tribunal is relatively powerless over this kind of player.  But you have to wonder, like this reporter said:

why1

It is confusing, but some people just want to watch the world burn.

PunishWarning

 

Case #3: The Serial Flamer

Speaking of burns, this case showcases how not respond to being flamed.  This Ashe has to go solo-bot in a low-level game.  He’s not getting the support he wants from his team and decides he just wants the game to be over:

ashe1

His team responds negatively to his negativity, and the flame war is on from there:

ashe2

He’s then threatened with reports for the language above, to which he responds:

ashe3

Clearly he knows how this process works and what’s coming if he keeps behaving badly.

ashe4

Unfortunately, he has the common misconceptions of players who hear about the Tribunal but don’t use it.  Sweaty nerds or not, the consistent flaming got him a very familiar:

PunishTime Ban

 

 

Case #2: Worst Troll of the Week

This player doesn’t even have the excuse of being “provoked”.  He views bad play as “trolling” and he just starts ripping into his teammates:

cho1

His all-caps yelling didn’t seem to improve the situation, so he moved on to:

cho2

Complaining to the other team for sympathy.  That also didn’t seem to help, so then:

cho3

Some very direct (and racist) insults; also not very effective at making his team play better.  So then:

cho4

At the end of the game he gives up.  Riven’s sentiment is probably correct.  No one is perfect, but bad play wasn’t trolling, it was just someone playing badly.  Either way, yelling at them wasn’t going to help anything.  But something tells me this player knows that already and doesn’t care.

PunishTime Ban

 

Case #1: Permaban of the Week submitted by Joux

Joux sums up this permaban succinctly: “Apparently, everyone is a failed abortion”.  But in addition to that “friendly” sentiment, this player had this to add:

swaggin1

He’s swaggin’, but he’s also insultin’:

swaggin2

And all that swag couldn’t save him from a deserved permaban:

Punishpermaban

 

That’s all for this week! We’ll be back next week with another round of Tribunal Cases of the Weak.

Have a case you think should be included? Send your submissions to [email protected]. Be sure to include the case number and region, your summoner name, and explain what makes it interesting.

Welcome to Tribunal Cases of the Weak. Every week you’ll get the best/weirdest/worst Tribunal cases. As always, purple text is the accused, green text is the team-mates, and red is the opponents. The title of each case is a link to the full Tribunal case, but don’t click through unless you’re ready for NSFW language. Unsure of what the Tribunal is or how it works? Read Riot’s FAQ.

 

Last week’s post generated a lot of comments about the Tribunal being too strict and inconsistent.  Many left comments and sent emails decrying the unfairness of the Tribunal and demanding that it be removed, changed or fixed.  Others responded with a flood of submissions detailing horrible offenses actually worthy of bans.  Below are five submission from readers like you.

 

Case #5: The Queen of Rage submitted by That One Six

That One Six says, “I can’t even begin to describe the level of rage this guy expressed in his Elise game.  He was hyper racist and openly malicious towards his fellow players.  He deserved a permaban, in my eyes, but this is probably the worst I’ve ever seen in my 2,500 cases judged.”  Here’s a sample of this player’s behavior:

elise1

And:

elise2

And:

elise3

The Tribunal probably didn’t have to think too long on this one:

PunishTime Ban

 

 

Case #4: The Misplaced Rager submitted by Mashedi

Mashedi sent along this guide to his submission.  “I got a very funny one for you.  Just take a look at the 2nd game, it starts with:

irelia1

and ends with:

irelia2

Do I need to say anything more? quite obvious.”  The only thing to add is this gem from just before the end of the game:

irelia3

Well, she got what she wanted:

PunishTime Ban

 

 

Case #3: The Gatekeeper submitted by Tirain

“This is hilarious because he claims he has anti ban runes per level and flat quints that cost 56k IP each.  He also claims to be the plat gatekeeper and not let “trash” players finish their series in a win.”

Looks like the Ez stopped trying part way through the game, and started feeding the towers:

ez1

And then claimed he was losing on purpose to prevent his team from getting promoted:

ez2

And finished that up by claiming his anti-ban runes would save him:

ez3

You can see where this is going.

PunishTime Ban

 

 

Case #2: The Feeder submitted by Vokuhilla

Vokuhilla passed this case along because of the direct and obvious feeding.  What kind of feeding?

feeding1

While sprinkling in fun comments like:

feeding2

Not much to discuss here:

PunishTime Ban

 

 

Case #1: Worst Troll of the Weak submitted by KDragon5

“This summoner swore consistently in his games, did not manage to say anything positive, and repeatedly used the N-word in all of the games in this report.  Also, he/she was reported in 36 times in 5 games.  Thats an average of more than 7 reports PER GAME.  I have never seen a case with this many reports, or this many reports per game.”

Here’s a sample report page:

worsttroll1

That’s nine reports in this one game.  To say that another way, this guy was so bad everyone else in the game reported him.  Now that’s some epic trolling.

PunishTime Ban

 

No Permabans submitted this week, but there doesn’t have to be to get the point across.  The Tribunal is a community enforcement tool, one that is designed to reflect the mores of the players.  It’s also designed to give toxic players a chance to reform.  It’s not perfect, but Riot would say that it’s making the game a better place.  The best way to “fix” the Tribunal is for everyone to use it.  So if you have some free time this week, pop over to the Tribunal and see what your fellow players are doing in games.  Punish a troll because the next game he ruins could be yours.

 

Have a case you think should be included? Send your submissions to [email protected]. Be sure to include the case number and region, your summoner name, and explain what makes it interesting.

Welcome to Tribunal Cases of the Weak. Every week you’ll get the best/weirdest/worst Tribunal cases. As always, purple text is the accused, green text is the team-mates, and red is the opponents. The title of each case is a link to the full Tribunal case, but don’t click through unless you’re ready for NSFW language. Unsure of what the Tribunal is or how it works? Read Riot’s FAQ.

 

Case #5: The Sore Loser

This player is smurfing on a low-level account. He feels that the level of play, surprisingly, isn’t very high. He ends every game with the same send off:

game1

Got to love the “bg nobs”; nobs is just a wonderful misspelling of noobs.  He was reported in every game for his poor attitude, and received:

PunishWarning

 

 

Case #4: The Sore Winner

This player is also smurfing on a low-level account. Unlike the player in Case #1, this player only taunts his opponents when he wins. Here is how he ends every win:

sore winner

In Game 5, which he loses, he doesn’t say anything. This player was reported for his taunts at the end of his wins, and he got:

PunishWarning

 

Case #3: The Blatant Feeder

Intentionally feeding is pretty clear cut in the Tribunal. Some players take an ironic twist on it though. Here are his scores:

amumu2

And here is his statement in the only game he talked in:

amumu1

Well those “bitches” reported him, and he got:

PunishTime Ban

 

 

Case #2: Worst Troll of the Week

There’s awful stuff in all five games here, so don’t click through unless you’re into that kind of thing. What stands out, though, is the “psychology” that this player is projecting onto his victims. Like this in Game 1:

worst1

Game 2:

worst4

Game 3:

worst3

Game 4:

worst2

After all of this, you have to wonder who really has the daddy issues. There’s plenty of other inappropriate behavior in there, but it looks like he was a first time offender:

PunishWarning

 

 

Case #1: Permaban of the Week

The Permaban this week might not be a clear cut case for a lot of people. The player is negative overall, but not harshly so. He does, however, use a term that many players, including streamers, use quite often. Here it is in Game 1:

perma1

And in Game 3:

perma2

Share your opinion in the comments below. The Tribunal can be a vanguard on player behavior and hold higher standards than the streamers exemplify or people experience in real life. This may be a case of that for some readers, where this word doesn’t offend, much like “faggot” and its pervasiveness. In this case, however, it seems to have caused this player’s permaban, if only by a simple majority.

Punishpermaban

 

That’s all for this week! We’ll be back next week with another round of Tribunal Cases of the Weak.

Have a case you think should be included? Send your submissions to [email protected]. Be sure to include the case number and region, your summoner name, and explain what makes it interesting.

Welcome to Tribunal Cases of the Weak. Every week you’ll get the best/weirdest/worst Tribunal cases. As always, purple text is the accused, green text is the team-mates, and red is the opponents. The title of each case is a link to the full Tribunal case, but don’t click through unless you’re ready for NSFW language. Unsure of what the Tribunal is or how it works? Read Riot’s FAQ.

 

Case #5: Judging the Judicator

The player in this case is guilty of one simple offense.  There are five games total, and they are pretty clean, except for right at the end of two of them:

kayle2

That was game three, this is game five:

kayle1

Poor sportsmanship at its simplest.  Whether this is really punishable has been debated often on the forums, but in this case it was.

PunishTime Ban

Case #4: Dunking the Dunkmaster submitted by wes3449

Submitter wes3449 of NA had this to say about the case: “While this isn’t the most blatant case of abuse, I find it particularly funny because of how he thinks that what he is doing is perfectly fine, and that he’s actually following the summoner’s code.”

First Darius says this:

darius1

And then goes on to explain:

darius2

He’s so confident that calling people noobs is ok and that the reports won’t affect him.  The Tribunal said: Get Dunked!

PunishTime Ban

 

 Case #3: Silently Feeding

The player in this case didn’t say anything in these three games, but his scores do tell a story:

feeder1

Certainly those are unusual builds.  Now you might be tempted to say the Lux game was good, but that was a game against bots.  His fellow players didn’t appreciate his play or builds in these three games, and the Tribunal didn’t either:

PunishTime Ban

Case #2: Worst Troll of the Week submitted by Thrasher33

Thrasher33 of EUNE sent along this case, saying: “He was raging all game long, but there are lines that deserve special attention”.  Lines like this:

drunkdarius

That probably explains the all-caps raging.  PSA: Don’t play drunk.  You’re mean when you’re drunk.

PunishWarning

Case #1: PERMABAN OF THE WEEK

This player picked a very particular insult to hurl at his enemies:

varus1

No idea how he knows what his enemy’s crotch smells like, but he went on:

varus2

And on:

varus3

Yeah…  so strange and uncalled for.  This player got what was coming to him.

Punishpermaban

 

That’s all for this week! We’ll be back next week with another round of Tribunal Cases of the Weak.

Have a case you think should be included? Send your submissions to [email protected]. Be sure to include the case number and region, your summoner name, and explain what makes it interesting.