Home > Original Content > Tribunal Cases of the Weak – Vol 9

Tribunal Cases of the Weak – Vol 9

January 29th, 2013 Leave a comment

Welcome to Tribunal Cases of the Weak.  Every week you’ll get the best/weirdest/worst Tribunal cases.  As always, purple text is the accused, green text is the teammates, and red is the opponents. The actual cases are NSFW.

 

Case #5: This Is Your Game…

You know your game normally.  It’s good, it’s under control.  What about someone who does this:

solo yolo dolo

Solo Yolo Dolo?  And pages of cursing and complaining?

drugs

Yes, this is your game on drugs.

PunishTime Ban

 

Case #4: What’s In a Name

Sometimes it seems like special characters only serve to get around the banned word filter.  Like in this case, where the player cleverly named himself Rim Joß.  That’s pretty inappropriate.  But it only starts there:

r1mjob

You stay classy LoL trolls.

PunishTime Ban

 

Case #3: No Master of Self Control

Master Yi, the Wuju Bladesman, was slicing and dicing his teammates in these games.  He’s not too friendly when you aren’t playing to his standards:

yi1

And if that wasn’t direct enough:

yi2

A first time offender, unfortunately:

PunishWarning

 

Case #2: Worst Troll of the Week submitted by iEpic

Credit to iEpic of the NA server for bringing us this gem.  ”What makes this interesting: I have never, ever, in my time on league or in the tribunal, seen someone so VILE and so SINISTER to say so many racist things over the course of 4 games. He fed nearly every game and even when he didn’t he just pulled the race card. It was seriously so stupid it was laughable, the worst part of it is this toxic player only got a warning, I’m hoping I never have to see someone like him. EVER.”

worst troll

“The amount of racism in this tribunal case is TOO DAMN HIGH!”

PunishWarning

 

Case #1: PERMABAN OF THE WEEK

This player may be one of the most self-absorbed player formerly in the game.

say ok

Threatening to feed and ruin a game until someone says “ok”.  And he means it:

say ok2

And he did.  He put himself way before his team and couldn’t handle himself in a mature way.  You know it wasn’t his first offense, because:

Punish permaban

 

That’s all for this week!  We’ll be back next week with another round of Tribunal Cases of the Weak.

Have a case you think should be included?  Send your submissions to tribunalcasesoftheweak@gmail.com.  Be sure to include the case number and region, your summoner name, and explain what makes it interesting.
Categories: Original Content Tags: , , ,
  1. HelenaSmithe22
    January 31st, 2013 at 05:39 | #1

    just before I saw the check ov $4353, I have faith …that…my brothers friend was like actualey bringing home money in there spare time from there pretty old laptop.. there mums best friend has been doing this 4 only about 7 months and resantly cleard the debts on their condo and purchased Chrysler. this is where I went, Great60.comCHECK IT OUT

  2. Kearar
    January 31st, 2013 at 01:20 | #2

    Warning for that racism in case 2 but a time ban for case 5? Seems like you have your priorities mixed …

  3. wedny
    January 31st, 2013 at 00:44 | #3

    serieus? U ban for that shit? and Give perma bans for the last one..Thats just plain sad.
    Its the internet dont take people serieus…just let them put out their frustrations..its better online then in the real world. And, u can also mute instead of crying and report..just sad.

  4. Bad Image examples
    January 30th, 2013 at 09:06 | #4

    Case#5: Unnecessary amounts of cursing, justified a time ban I guess.

    Case#4: This person is trying really hard to do his thing, whatever it is. It’s good that he’s shown it’s fucking stupid and not really welcomed.

    Case#3: The Yi is very frustrated with his team because they’re bad/new players. Hopefully his warning make him ditch the harassments and stick to giving gameplay advice.

    Case#2: Personally these kind of people is muted the first 2min, so I’ve never had a problem with them. I don’t really care if they’re banned or not, I mean who can take them seriously?

    Case#1: Hah. A person who thinks he’s someone to give other orders over the internet. Someone who blindly thinks they’re above others when it’s far from it. Permaban worthy indeed.

    PS. Click The Actual Link To The Tribunal And Read It.

  5. brbrbr
    January 30th, 2013 at 04:55 | #5

    fucking sand niggers in the tribunal, man. why do they banned the white bro… WHYTE POWER sand niggers can only be jelly of our blond hair, blue eyes and white skin… fucking sand niggers voting in the tribubal

  6. Losteal
    January 30th, 2013 at 00:13 | #6

    @Freshup3D
    i cannot agree with you more,
    he’s pumped up, enthusiast and even want to perform well, and ffs even if he’s on cocaine it would jsut enhance his focus :D :D so ridicoulus

  7. Blanq
    January 29th, 2013 at 23:45 | #7

    you should really click on the case and read through. you would understand. @Freshup3D

  8. Mcfleshface
    January 29th, 2013 at 22:32 | #8

    @Dude
    “and if you are still mad about the fact that your grandpa’s nation could only 4v1 germany – get over it ^^”
    You sound proud of it, although you had nothing to do with it, and it is nothing to be proud of.
    The shouldn’t insult you for being german, they should insult you for being proud of WWII.

  9. iEpic
    January 29th, 2013 at 16:14 | #9

    Hey guys, so happy I got the number two spot :D

  10. Freshup3D
    January 29th, 2013 at 14:48 | #10

    This is so broken, the Darius in the first case…he did nothing and got a time ban…and guys like this yi and other people flaming everyone and everything get a warning??
    there is something wrong

  11. fred
    January 29th, 2013 at 14:40 | #11

    @tribunal.. what a joke
    u dumb bro?

    Tribunal doesnt decide the punishment. Only wether to punish or pardon. LOL

  12. womd
    January 29th, 2013 at 13:12 | #12

    I’m not sure what’s worse. The people in these tribunals, or the mass of comments in this thread from people that have no idea how the tribunal works or how to read o.o

  13. Pupermikels
    January 29th, 2013 at 13:10 | #13

    Must get rid of guys like them. for better game

  14. Tribunal needs to be elected
    January 29th, 2013 at 13:01 | #14

    I actually took some time to spend on like 20 tribunal cases just to take a look at the procedure.
    I think its really bad results show off mainly because people don’t like to spend 5 min per case (why would u go to tribunal then??!!) and they rather just watch the first case , look at the 10 first sentences the “accused” wrote and judge on account of it. All my conclusions of the cases , which i carefully studied came to the conclusion that the final decision was about only 50-60% the same as mine. And I’m quite sure this is pretty bad, considerung noone probably took the time i spent on the cases.
    conclusion: tribunal should be done by elected people. It’s just useless if everybody can vote on anything, without getting punished themselves if they miss horribly, which the case of Dyrus seems to be a proof. U have no insurance that ignorant people will always be a considerable part of tribunal.
    It should only be able to pass report if s.o. rly took some time and described what he’s reporting the person for, otherwise it makes no sense. it prolongs the tribunal’s work unneccessarily and it’s just ignorant and senseless.

  15. Shit Tribunal
    January 29th, 2013 at 12:42 | #15

    So now people can see how shitty the tribunal is, and the shitty reasons why people report people for no reason in the fucking game. Darius just fooling around and so was Garen, but people just press the report button. Tribunal is so fucking sad, so is the people abusing the report button, like honestly, in every fucking game when I give advice to someone who makes a mistake, they get all mad and say muted and reported, can’t believe the Tribunal even has an elo system, how the fuck does that work? There is more ratios of Yes to ban than No to ban .

  16. Xenocidist
    January 29th, 2013 at 12:03 | #16

    The first guy curly should not have been banned. He did absolutely nothing wrong. If the tribunal keeps this up players will turn away from the game.

  17. Paladin One
    January 29th, 2013 at 10:47 | #17

    (ninja’d by Jio Derako)

  18. Paladin One
    January 29th, 2013 at 10:45 | #18

    One of the basic rules I use with tribunal case judging is, “Would I want to have this person as an ally or opponent?”
    If I can easily say “no”, a Punish vote is often in line.

    As for the actual punishments, the warning always drops before the ban, and the permaban doesn’t drop until after repeated time bans. The people that got warnings just haven’t been in tribunal before now, no matter how insulting they may seem. This is most likely because they are playing on new accounts, and the tribunal does take time to gather its information (read: it takes time for the players to play enough matches for the tribunal to build a case). And that last Jax who got the permaban, has been time banned most likely 5 or 6 times by now. It’s not that this particular tribunal case would have the word “permaban” written all over it, it is that this person has a history of being banned time and time again.

    TL;DR most people who cry “tribunal is broken” don’t understand/appreciate how it actually works.

  19. oldmanbubbles
    January 29th, 2013 at 10:27 | #19

    People saying that Darius did nothing wrong need to actually read all the game chat. He clearly deserved his ban.

  20. Jio Derako
    January 29th, 2013 at 10:26 | #20

    kindafunny, maybe you should add some sort of note at the top of these pages? Bright red flashing letters perhaps, explaining that these are just excerpts from the Tribunal cases and there’s links to the full cases in each title. (you can be more subtle about it if you like, whatever floats your boat.)

    Seriously though, it does seem to confuse an awful lot of people how the Tribunal works, so some info at the top might be a good idea.

    To everyone else who seems to think these bans were totally unfair: the Tribunal does not allow participants to choose the punishment level. Tribunal users are given all the info shown on the page there (click the title of each section to view the full cases), which includes the full game chat, as well as ending scores and item builds. Using this info, they can vote “punish” or “do not punish”.
    First-time offenders will be given a Warning if they are punished in this way. Repeat offenders receive Time Bans, which is a temporary ban. After being punished multiple times (that’s multiple cases, not multiple votes), they will earn a Permaban, which will only be given after a Riot employee has reviewed the full case to ensure it is indeed ban-worthy.

    Jax got a permaban because he’s seriously that terrible. Look at the cases, there’s five different ones. His final one is the worst of the bunch; a 3v3 match, he builds Blade of the Ruined King, Infinity Edge, and three Vampiric Scepters, yells at his Fiddlesticks not to come top twice, then yells at him later for not coming top when he pinged for it. He also forced the Yi to let him take the solo lane, saying “I’m top – I’m top – no exceptions”.

    As for Darius, go look at his first case, playing as Jarvan. He curses out his mid-lane Teemo, demands his team get him blue buffs because “i use a lota mana”, then starts telling people to change lanes to his whim (first deciding to go jungle, then later telling Teemo to give him mid). Yeah, I’d report that too.

    And Brand? You don’t even need to click-through to the cases to see that he’s breaking rules. Offensive names are one thing, you’ll get a warning and be forced to change your name. Going around talking about giving people rimjobs in your games is a different story, and yeah, you’re going to get a warning for that. sad thing is, that was his 5th case; the other 4 are worse, cursing out his ADC for stealing kills from him.

  21. Demoyn
    January 29th, 2013 at 10:14 | #21

    You’re right. The Tribunal isn’t broken, it’s the horribly stupid rules Riot has.

  22. Glowv2
    January 29th, 2013 at 10:04 | #22

    Tribunal not broke?
    So the second to last case got warning but last got perm ban?
    com on tribunal

  23. RLY?
    January 29th, 2013 at 09:56 | #23

    This Garen is obviously trolling,but even if he’s not trolling,he is more of a narcissist than a racist…

  24. Alcapwn
    January 29th, 2013 at 09:43 | #24

    Darius and Brand broke the summoners code. Tribunal isn’t broken, if you read the Summoners Code they both violated. “Rimjobs” and claiming you are on a drug are violations worthy of punishment. If you actually read it you will find out that even “gg noobs” is punishable.

  25. True That
    January 29th, 2013 at 09:39 | #25

    @Serious Guy
    true that

  26. Serious Guy
    January 29th, 2013 at 09:39 | #26

    You have no right to complain about tribunal, if you dont even visit tribunal and solve some cases yourself bro !

  27. tribunal.. what a joke
    January 29th, 2013 at 09:30 | #27

    Tribunal is such a joke. “most toxic player ever” “warning” someone calls someone bad at league. timeban. Get some standards tribunal. You people are just a lottery, you randomly assign bans and warnings out of a hat. Then you claim “first time offender so just a warning” when I don’t know anyone who ever got a warning before having a timeban.

  28. Brisholine
    January 29th, 2013 at 09:24 | #28

    Players like the one who got permabanned are in almost all low elo games, that’s not a very uncommon thing. That just shows that the LoL community sucks.

  29. Surai
    January 29th, 2013 at 09:24 | #29

    @wtf is this shit

    CLICK ON THE FUCKING LINK.
    He flamed all of his teammates and got reportet for it in 3 games. There is just not everything he said posted.

  30. Dude
    January 29th, 2013 at 09:20 | #30

    just got insulted for being german…

    i mean – what the hell is wrong with those guys ?

    if you still think germans are nazis – go to school & get history lessons
    if you think racism is funny – grow up bro
    and if you are still mad about the fact that your grandpa’s nation could only 4v1 germany – get over it ^^

  31. xYaYYaJx
    January 29th, 2013 at 09:18 | #31

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5Otla5157c
    All i can say, yolo: YOU OUGHTA LOOK OUT

  32. wtf is this shit
    January 29th, 2013 at 09:15 | #32

    Darius permaban? Where are the pages of cursing and complaining? All I see is someone trying to be funny in his own way (solo yolo dolo)… If these “evidence” deserves a ban then the tribunal is broken.

  33. KuanZe
    January 29th, 2013 at 09:10 | #33

    rlly guys, wtf is wrong with that darius? Where do you fuking see offensive language in him? Tribunal is so broken and wrong and this case just proofs it.

  34. God
    January 29th, 2013 at 09:08 | #34

    This just goes to show how retarded “the Tribunal is” Darius did nothing wrong… maybe brand for spaming but darius did nothing wrong

  35. Wtf?
    January 29th, 2013 at 09:02 | #35

    What the fuck? The Darius did nothing wrong. The Brand barely did anything wrong; if anything, he should have just had his name changed because it was “inappropriate.” Not only are these Tribunal cases retardedly judged, but the choosing of these two as one of the 5 “tribunal cases of the week” either shows bad choice or there’s really almost nothing to see in Tribunal cases.

  36. Mortoxic
    January 29th, 2013 at 08:21 | #36

    Darius Yolo Top :D